Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Happy Birthday Robert ( Rsv1cox )by Kim Today at 3:48 am
» COX .020 RC PROJECT
by 1/2A Nut Today at 2:49 am
» Project Cox .049 r/c & Citabrian Champion
by MauricioB Today at 2:10 am
» Irvine Mills .75 replica
by Coxfledgling Today at 1:54 am
» **VOTE-ON-THE-NEXT-COX-ENGINE-OF-THE-MONTH** (October 2024)
by GallopingGhostler Today at 12:01 am
» WILLY NILLY
by MANDALAY Yesterday at 10:56 pm
» Stick built rubber powered Scientific ME-109
by DPCM Yesterday at 5:36 pm
» The Cabin.........A carpenters nightmare.
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 5:26 pm
» Cox 020 PeeWee rebuild questions
by rdw777 Yesterday at 2:12 pm
» I Got Cheated!
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 2:06 pm
» PSA propellors!!!
by robot797 Yesterday at 6:24 am
» "Rodd-O-Gyro"
by Oldenginerod Yesterday at 4:54 am
Cox Engine of The Month
OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
Page 1 of 1
OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
The crankcase on this is strange. It is in two parts and the front end is bulky with very little webbing.
ian1954- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2688
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 70
Location : England
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
Design is as such so ball bearings could be fitted easily?
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5619
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
I'd be very curious to see that engine stunt. I know it came in different versions such as ringed and ABC. I would also like to add, they were extremely well made and no pennies pinched.
Ken Cook- Top Poster
- Posts : 5609
Join date : 2012-03-27
Location : pennsylvania
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
It's a nice looking engine, no doubt it would be a good runner.
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
-
Posts : 5619
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 70
Location : Clovis NM or NFL KC Chiefs
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
These were the 'Chevy small block' of .40 R/C engines in the 80's-90's, well made, easy to needle and great power. The FSR series was copied by Thunder Tiger (Magnum) and sold by the thousands. But for a U/C engine not so much, they would be on the heavy side and unless you did some major re-porting you'd need to run it in a two-stoke mode with a big diameter, small pitch prop.
I'd guess and say it was a cost/production thing with the two piece case. Later O.S. engines went to a one piece and i remember claims of RPM gains by the one piece case being more rigid? I planted a .40 FSR one time and was able to replace the front end only (with a Magnum part) and save the engine.
I'd guess and say it was a cost/production thing with the two piece case. Later O.S. engines went to a one piece and i remember claims of RPM gains by the one piece case being more rigid? I planted a .40 FSR one time and was able to replace the front end only (with a Magnum part) and save the engine.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum