Log in
Search
Latest topics
» 1:64 scale Diecast (Hot Wheels)by roddie Today at 10:14 pm
» New P-38 profile scratch build log
by roddie Today at 9:52 pm
» Automobiles you don't see everyday...
by roddie Today at 9:34 pm
» *Cox Engine of The Month* Submit your pictures! -October 2023-
by cstatman Today at 8:19 pm
» Here we go again... another Lawn-Boy
by Admin Today at 5:58 pm
» You got dope
by Ken Cook Today at 3:20 pm
» I have a theory about this............
by GallopingGhostler Today at 2:36 pm
» Wen-Mac Flying Toy, Patented 1960
by getback Today at 6:22 am
» Happy Birthday to me............
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 9:42 pm
» Miles Magister Rubber Powered Model
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 8:59 am
» Fox .35 Modifications
by Onelife Yesterday at 4:37 am
» Sweet Cindy
by pman1111 Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:14 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
September-2023
balogh's

"Beefed up old stock 290 on my Quickie100 RC after plenty of airtime hours..."

PAST WINNERS
balogh's

"Beefed up old stock 290 on my Quickie100 RC after plenty of airtime hours..."

PAST WINNERS
OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
Page 1 of 1
ian1954- Diamond Member
- Posts : 2688
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 69
Location : England
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
Design is as such so ball bearings could be fitted easily?
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
Posts : 4812
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 69
Location : Clovis, NM, USA
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
I'd be very curious to see that engine stunt. I know it came in different versions such as ringed and ABC. I would also like to add, they were extremely well made and no pennies pinched.
Ken Cook- Top Poster
- Posts : 5261
Join date : 2012-03-27
Location : pennsylvania
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
It's a nice looking engine, no doubt it would be a good runner.
GallopingGhostler- Top Poster
Posts : 4812
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 69
Location : Clovis, NM, USA
Re: OS MAX-40F-SR STUNT
These were the 'Chevy small block' of .40 R/C engines in the 80's-90's, well made, easy to needle and great power. The FSR series was copied by Thunder Tiger (Magnum) and sold by the thousands. But for a U/C engine not so much, they would be on the heavy side and unless you did some major re-porting you'd need to run it in a two-stoke mode with a big diameter, small pitch prop.
I'd guess and say it was a cost/production thing with the two piece case. Later O.S. engines went to a one piece and i remember claims of RPM gains by the one piece case being more rigid? I planted a .40 FSR one time and was able to replace the front end only (with a Magnum part) and save the engine.
I'd guess and say it was a cost/production thing with the two piece case. Later O.S. engines went to a one piece and i remember claims of RPM gains by the one piece case being more rigid? I planted a .40 FSR one time and was able to replace the front end only (with a Magnum part) and save the engine.

» Calling all Fox fans
» Stunt Man 23
» PAW .049 SET UP FOR C/L STUNT...?
» Cox me-109 stunt measures - for a friend - he wants to build one again !
» Stunt Man 23
» Stunt Man 23
» PAW .049 SET UP FOR C/L STUNT...?
» Cox me-109 stunt measures - for a friend - he wants to build one again !
» Stunt Man 23
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum