Log in
Search
Latest topics
» 1:64 scale Diecast (Hot Wheels)by roddie Today at 10:14 pm
» New P-38 profile scratch build log
by roddie Today at 9:52 pm
» Automobiles you don't see everyday...
by roddie Today at 9:34 pm
» *Cox Engine of The Month* Submit your pictures! -October 2023-
by cstatman Today at 8:19 pm
» Here we go again... another Lawn-Boy
by Admin Today at 5:58 pm
» You got dope
by Ken Cook Today at 3:20 pm
» I have a theory about this............
by GallopingGhostler Today at 2:36 pm
» Wen-Mac Flying Toy, Patented 1960
by getback Today at 6:22 am
» Happy Birthday to me............
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 9:42 pm
» Miles Magister Rubber Powered Model
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 8:59 am
» Fox .35 Modifications
by Onelife Yesterday at 4:37 am
» Sweet Cindy
by pman1111 Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:14 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
September-2023
balogh's

"Beefed up old stock 290 on my Quickie100 RC after plenty of airtime hours..."

PAST WINNERS
balogh's

"Beefed up old stock 290 on my Quickie100 RC after plenty of airtime hours..."

PAST WINNERS
New in box PT-19
Page 1 of 1
New in box PT-19
Not trying to nit-pik. Just was curious what the general consensus from the members here is considered "new" ?
The auction site states "condition is new." But does that mean, to the average buyer, that the condition of the new unassembled parts are also considered original to the plane?

My understanding, with the closed nose PT-19, is that the firewall is usually the same color as the wing or blue as in this case. Maybe a factory mistake or something else?
Thoughts?

The auction site states "condition is new." But does that mean, to the average buyer, that the condition of the new unassembled parts are also considered original to the plane?

My understanding, with the closed nose PT-19, is that the firewall is usually the same color as the wing or blue as in this case. Maybe a factory mistake or something else?
Thoughts?

DrCox- Gold Member
- Posts : 229
Join date : 2018-07-18
Location : Wisconsin
Re: New in box PT-19
i'd say its correct, Cox wasn't as perfect we'd like to believe. I've seen worse screw ups.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum