Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Dremel/rotary-tool helpful tip threadby roddie Today at 6:05 pm
» Speed plane - Crispy but not too crispy
by rsv1cox Today at 5:19 pm
» hobbyking "covering film" opinions?
by cmulder Today at 12:52 pm
» Your oldest "active" model?
by cmulder Today at 12:28 pm
» Old CL Gee Bee
by rdw777 Today at 12:12 pm
» Wen Mac XL-600 Fan Jet - Something different
by rsv1cox Today at 9:16 am
» So where is George the Gallopying Ghoster?
by getback Today at 8:56 am
» Cox 020 PeeWee rebuild questions
by balogh Today at 7:41 am
» "Kim's Breezy Hill Editorial"
by rdw777 Yesterday at 9:23 am
» Cox red tank mount for beam mount 049 engines
by ffkiwi Wed Jan 15, 2025 4:25 pm
» My knock-off Gee Bee of Robert's Gee Bee post
by rsv1cox Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:38 am
» My knock-off Gee Bee of Robert's and Bob's Gee Bee posts
by rsv1cox Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:31 am
Buoancy test
Page 1 of 1
Buoancy test
Earlier this Summer I did a test to see how much weight a pair of foam panels (hull sides) would support and remain afloat. Today I did a similar test.. and got more useful information.
No one wants their boat to sink.. so if there are flotation provisions; will they be sufficient? My current Rigger project utilizes Polystyrene foam sponsons which provide most of the functional buoancy.
For this test; the only metal parts in the boat are the aluminum boom-tubes and the brass stuffing tube. I wanted to see how much weight; (in necessary running-gear, fuel and ballast..) could be added.. and have the model stay afloat.
I made-up a balanced-pair of weighted-slings using automotive lug-nuts strung on zip-ties.. which I "hung" from the aft-boom-tube on both sides, between the hull and sponsons. My first test was with 15.62 oz. which "sunk" the hull.. so I had to remove a few lug-nuts..
Given the 2nd test result; I'm fairly confident that the existing (functional) flotation will support 3/4 of a pound.. before needing to add any. NOTE: A waterproof radio-box adds functional flotation.
Next test was to drain the hull.. and "float-it".. to see where it balances; with those weights still hanging from the aft boom-tube.
I'm liking the result.. because the engine will be immediately aft of that point.. with the fuel-cell, Rx and batt. immediately fwd. of it.
No one wants their boat to sink.. so if there are flotation provisions; will they be sufficient? My current Rigger project utilizes Polystyrene foam sponsons which provide most of the functional buoancy.
For this test; the only metal parts in the boat are the aluminum boom-tubes and the brass stuffing tube. I wanted to see how much weight; (in necessary running-gear, fuel and ballast..) could be added.. and have the model stay afloat.
I made-up a balanced-pair of weighted-slings using automotive lug-nuts strung on zip-ties.. which I "hung" from the aft-boom-tube on both sides, between the hull and sponsons. My first test was with 15.62 oz. which "sunk" the hull.. so I had to remove a few lug-nuts..
Given the 2nd test result; I'm fairly confident that the existing (functional) flotation will support 3/4 of a pound.. before needing to add any. NOTE: A waterproof radio-box adds functional flotation.
Next test was to drain the hull.. and "float-it".. to see where it balances; with those weights still hanging from the aft boom-tube.
I'm liking the result.. because the engine will be immediately aft of that point.. with the fuel-cell, Rx and batt. immediately fwd. of it.
Similar topics
» The 1st International COX mouse race
» Pushrod testing
» This is only a test
» cox rc cars gtp 049 mod
» Non Slip Screwdriver Tip
» Pushrod testing
» This is only a test
» cox rc cars gtp 049 mod
» Non Slip Screwdriver Tip
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum