Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register.

Logged in members see NO ADVERTISEMENTS!

Removing QRC muffler - Page 2 Cox_ba12

Removing QRC muffler - Page 2 Pixel

Log in

I forgot my password


Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» German surrender 76 years ago
by Cribbs74 Today at 5:16 am

» Follow Rusty's Memorial Traveling Engines!
by getback Today at 4:59 am

» Propane Exchange
by Admin Today at 1:54 am

» Right up there with burnt castor oil.
by Admin Yesterday at 9:34 pm

» Cox 049 Tatone muffler
by Scotland421 Yesterday at 1:27 pm

» How does your Garden Grow
by Marleysky Yesterday at 9:31 am

» Bird feeder, new visitor
by Marleysky Yesterday at 8:57 am

» New project... Loop Graupner "Glow"
by getback Yesterday at 7:38 am

» Happy birthday Bernie
by KariFS Yesterday at 6:04 am

» Cox .020 Skycopter fuel tank replacement
by getback Yesterday at 5:47 am

by MauricioB Thu May 06, 2021 11:58 pm

» Iced Tea Help Please......
by rsv1cox Thu May 06, 2021 7:30 pm

Cox Engine of The Month

Finely polished Cox .049 with exhaust collector.

CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
Forum Store
CEF Ear Savers

Removing QRC muffler - Page 2 Empty

Removing QRC muffler

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

Removing QRC muffler - Page 2 Empty Re: Removing QRC muffler

Post  GallopingGhostler Tue Apr 28, 2020 8:25 am

Welcome cggs. Here's an article from May 1967 Aeromodeller that explains the development of the QRC by its ancestor, the QZ.

Sceptre Flight Model Engine Tests  Cox 049 QZ

The rest of the engine articles including the Babe Bee are here:

Sceptre Flight Model Engine Tests Index
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Posts : 2581
Join date : 2013-07-13
Age : 67
Location : Clovis, Nuevo México

Back to top Go down

Removing QRC muffler - Page 2 Empty Re: Removing QRC muffler

Post  Ken Cook Tue Apr 28, 2020 8:48 am

Not to put more confusion into the equation. Anytime you put a muffler on a engine, your restricting it which causes a loss of rpm's. When you had a Babe Bee vs a QZ for instance, the power output of both were somewhat equal. The engine themselves were different in which the QZ/QRC utilized a dual bypass cylinder vs the single ported bee. In addition, to gain more rpm's, the muffled bees used a high compression head. Therefore it took a lot of modification to just regain the power of a stock bee.

         So the Bee and the muffled QRZ without mufflers side by side would or should  offer the QZ/QRC a distinctive advantage. I also believe and this might not be factual but the early QZ when first introduced used SPI and a shim was placed under the cylinder to reduce it whereas the later QRC cylinders were designed with no SPI. This suggests to me that the exhaust timing shim when removed offers SPI back to the cylinder enhancing performance even further.

         I have several of these engines, I kept all the mufflers/shims with everything. The performance was so poor that I removed all of it just to make the engine useable for control line flying. Back then I didn't use a tach to understand the true rpm's, we took the planes out and flew them. When something like a muffler was robbing critical rpm's  it was removed.  I never have gone back to using the stock equipment but out of curiosity, something tells me to give it a go once again. I have very few engines that have satisfied my liking using a muffler for my type of flying, the end result is typical, loss of power, overheating.
Ken Cook
Ken Cook
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 4314
Join date : 2012-03-27
Location : pennsylvania

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum