Log in
Search
Latest topics
» TAPLIN TWIN 7ccmby michaelherbst1 Today at 1:19 am
» The 2023 Annual World-Wide Ringmaster Fly-a-Thon October 7th & 8th.
by Kim Yesterday at 6:29 pm
» Mid-September, cold and rainy and a young mans thoughts turn to model trains and P-38's
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 4:52 pm
» Engineless Aurora P-47 .049/.060
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 3:11 pm
» Brodak Baby Ringmaster
by Droobie Yesterday at 10:16 am
» The Three Stooges
by 944_Jim Yesterday at 8:45 am
» Camping for the weekend
by akjgardner Yesterday at 8:19 am
» The third Cox Beaver chainsaw.......with a surprise
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 7:12 am
» Jerobee electric to glow conversion nr 2
by OVERLORD Yesterday at 2:05 am
» Bell P-39 Airacobra and P-63 Kingcobra confusion but so interesting
by rsv1cox Sat Sep 23, 2023 6:15 pm
» Guillows Piper Chrokee Rubber Powered
by Levent Suberk Sat Sep 23, 2023 5:15 pm
» music vids.. some of your favorites
by Levent Suberk Sat Sep 23, 2023 5:05 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
September-2023
balogh's

"Beefed up old stock 290 on my Quickie100 RC after plenty of airtime hours..."

PAST WINNERS
balogh's

"Beefed up old stock 290 on my Quickie100 RC after plenty of airtime hours..."

PAST WINNERS
Covering compatibility
Page 1 of 1
Covering compatibility
I had an issue with the old Ringmaster and I removed the ultracote covering from the bottom side of the wing.
I didn't have any more ultracote so I used monokote to recover. I sealed all the edges over the ultracote and then shrunk it tight. It appeared to work fine however. While flying the whole thing tore off in the air.
So are these coverings incompatible?
Ron
I didn't have any more ultracote so I used monokote to recover. I sealed all the edges over the ultracote and then shrunk it tight. It appeared to work fine however. While flying the whole thing tore off in the air.
So are these coverings incompatible?
Ron
Cribbs74- Moderator
Posts : 11887
Join date : 2011-10-24
Age : 49
Location : Tuttle, OK
Re: Covering compatibility
Apparently they stick and shrink at different temperatures Ron. Monokote has a higher temp range/tolerance. There's mixed opinions on compatibility between the two..from the little I've read. I've only used Monokote.. but I do have some "Towerkote" that I haven't worked with yet.. and now I'm curious if it's properties are more like Ultra or of Mono.
Re: Covering compatibility
I have never tried mixing them. The materials are different, Ultracote being polyester and Monokote being vinyl. I would have thought the glue on either one would stick to the surface of the other, as long as it had been cleaned of oil with acetone.
Rusty
Rusty
_________________
Don't Panic!
...and never Ever think about how good you are at something...
while you're doing it!
My Hot Rock & Blues Playlist
...and never Ever think about how good you are at something...
while you're doing it!
My Hot Rock & Blues Playlist
RknRusty- Rest In Peace
- Posts : 10869
Join date : 2011-08-10
Age : 67
Location : South Carolina, USA
Re: Covering compatibility
Ron, I've experienced the same thing. Ultracote and other low temp films in my experience don't go together well. Monokote requires almost twice the heat to install. Roddie, I've used Towercote. While it applies nicely, it sags badly in the slightest sun. It's not fuel proof as the fuel creeps under the seams melting away the color on the film backing leaving you with a real mess. It was designed for foam. It doesn't work well on that either. The color will embed itself in spots on the wood never to be removed. Ken
Ken Cook- Top Poster
- Posts : 5255
Join date : 2012-03-27
Location : pennsylvania

» any tricks on covering EPS foam with low-heat covering?
» Removing covering over covering or One bad bird!
» Ace Foam wings
» Painting and covering
» covering material?
» Removing covering over covering or One bad bird!
» Ace Foam wings
» Painting and covering
» covering material?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum