Log in
Search
Latest topics
» My first "control Line" model airplane was a Stanzel "Electromic Flash".by pman1111 Today at 3:03 pm
» Mr. 10,000
by rsv1cox Today at 12:15 pm
» Space Bug Jr. - Trying to determine just how stupid I want to get
by rdw777 Today at 11:57 am
» Allergy to glow fuel
by Levent Suberk Today at 11:43 am
» I invite you to a flight on board.
by getback Today at 6:51 am
» Nitro Fuel To Deliver to fiji Islands
by Iceberg Today at 6:42 am
» **VOTE-ON-THE-NEXT-COX-ENGINE-OF-THE-MONTH** (December 2023)
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 11:05 pm
» My CA or CyA (super glue) allergy
by roddie Yesterday at 8:58 pm
» New P-38 profile scratch build log
by roddie Yesterday at 8:35 pm
» Cox Engine Tests/reviews ONLY
by 1/2A Nut Yesterday at 6:37 pm
» It's been a nautical day
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 8:12 am
» The evil pliers, probably caused more damage
by rsv1cox Yesterday at 7:59 am
1949 Lawrence Institute of Technology G-1
Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: 1949 Lawrence Institute of Technology G-1
stuntflyer, the G-1 has straight rudders, tip weight and 'out' thrust. Being a pusher design the prop thrust washer end points into the circle. I use my standard formula of ~25% c.g. of MAC then bell crank pivot 1/4" behind that. The fore lead out rakes back to coincide with c.g at guide. The rear lead out run is normal to fuse. This gives me a decent float to land when the engine quits and I break less props with this set up. I used to put c.g. a little more forward but these little bombs end up being a rock on a string when the engine quit if you know what I mean!
Thanks for the prop info. I'll have to see what I can obtain. I have a 3 blade prop in there because I was afraid a cut down two blade won't have enough umph. I don't know a whole lot about making a Cox engine speedy so I'll try your ideas out on it! Thanks! Oh yeah... those pusher airplanes are pretty neat! A 'Pushy Cat' would be cool!

ARUP- Gold Member
- Posts : 179
Join date : 2015-09-13
Location : Kentucky
Re: 1949 Lawrence Institute of Technology G-1
I learned about Cox reedies through some write ups from a few people in the 90's, found that rpm is the key and they get there through short props because they only breath so well. Opening the intake after installing a Tee Dee piston and cylinder, I think 061" or a #61 drill can't remember which, leveling the piston with the deck of the cumbustion chamber by adjusting the cylinder up and down on the block, and using a HC head with a lot of gaskets to start and then adjusting for fuel (a lot of nitro=a lot of gaskets), and props. Once I was pitting for my eldest when he was about 9 so about 1990 in Mouse I, his prop kept getting shorter and the model kept going faster with the wide blade of the Cox props. APC's are probably better but I have limited exprience with them. Only in sport flying like Scale models.
Jimmy Miller's pushers are tops. Loved that guy, a real gentleman. Bohannon's copy was almost as good. Jimmy's was really light, low 500's and he was very slight himself. I was there when he won the Gold Final with it and I know it meant a lot to him. That one would be the best flyer for a model with that delta wing and an easy one to start.
Chris...
Jimmy Miller's pushers are tops. Loved that guy, a real gentleman. Bohannon's copy was almost as good. Jimmy's was really light, low 500's and he was very slight himself. I was there when he won the Gold Final with it and I know it meant a lot to him. That one would be the best flyer for a model with that delta wing and an easy one to start.
Chris...
stuntflyr- Gold Member
- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-01-18
Age : 64
Location : Tucson, Arizona
Re: 1949 Lawrence Institute of Technology G-1
Oh, our Mouse I engines weren't super fast but reliable and started out with NIB Golden Bees with NIB Tee Dee cylinders/piston sets. It was a SoCal guy that wrote the article I used, Paul G. may know whom I'm speaking of.
Chris...
Chris...
stuntflyr- Gold Member
- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-01-18
Age : 64
Location : Tucson, Arizona
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3

» Technology - Not so wonderful
» Other Technology that works better than RID.
» Car Batteries
» 1949 O.K. CUB .074-----YAHOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
» Dakota (Joe Wagner) 1949
» Other Technology that works better than RID.
» Car Batteries
» 1949 O.K. CUB .074-----YAHOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
» Dakota (Joe Wagner) 1949
Page 3 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum