Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register! Guests are limited to posting in the "General Questions (Guest Posting Allowed)" section only. Becoming a member is fast, easy and FREE!


Dragonfly vs. RC Bee Babe_b10
Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Flying the twins
by Ken Cook Today at 3:24 pm

» 2019 CEF Run What Ya Brung Unlimited Speed Contest Build Log
by Ken Cook Today at 3:22 pm

» How's the weather?
by Cribbs74 Today at 3:11 pm

» Flying a pattern at the Triple Tree contest.
by RknRusty Today at 12:01 pm

» How many engines?
by fredvon4 Today at 8:57 am

» Some of my Cox engines
by getback Today at 8:29 am

» 2019 World-Widw Ringmaster Fly-a-Thon---October 5th & 6th !!
by Kim Yesterday at 8:41 am

» Roll Call! Cars Are The Stars
by Kim Yesterday at 6:57 am

» LWS 3 with a Pee Wee
by dirk gently Yesterday at 3:38 am

» JEROBEE electric to TeeDee conversion
by OVERLORD Yesterday at 2:00 am

Cox Engine of The Month
May-2019
Tee Bee's

"This RR1 was restored for all the right reasons"


PAST WINNERS
Speed Contest 2019
CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
The Traveling Prop
Gallery


Dragonfly vs. RC Bee Empty
World of Aviation

Dragonfly vs. RC Bee

Go down

Dragonfly vs. RC Bee Empty Dragonfly vs. RC Bee

Post  VUgearhead on Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:43 pm

I am not familiar with the later years Cox cast engines, never owned one. But I was curious if they perform equally to the older milled case Cox engines.

I am particularly curious about the differences, if any, between the Cox RC Bee and the older Dragonfly engines.

Does anyone have experience with both where they could offer a comparison of the two engines?

Thanks,

VUgearhead
VUgearhead
Gold Member
Gold Member

Posts : 155
Join date : 2013-07-02
Age : 51
Location : Boynton Beach, FL

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Dragonfly vs. RC Bee Empty Re: Dragonfly vs. RC Bee

Post  ian1954 on Tue Jun 21, 2016 9:44 am

I personally have not seen a difference in performance and actually prefer a cast crankcase to a milled one. (Unless it is an engine I have made!). There is more character about a cast crankcase.

As for longevity I can't comment - but the cast crankcases were introduced as a money saving option to save on machining time. This didn't quite work as planned because the cast crankcase took more setting up time before it could be machined and was not easy to set up for machining.

There are bound to be differences in wear as the material will be different and, some of the cast crankcases I have, have been machined a little off centre and are not perfectly symmetrical at the back. They still run fine though.


ian1954
ian1954
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Posts : 2425
Join date : 2011-11-16
Age : 64
Location : England

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum