Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register.

Logged in members see NO ADVERTISEMENTS!


CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Cox_ba12




CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Pixel

Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Looking For Comet Tri-Pacer
by DanMc Today at 7:25 pm

» "Red Neck" .049 elec. starter
by 944_Jim Today at 7:04 pm

» Cox AT-6 Texan repaint.....Pretty nice
by 944_Jim Today at 4:31 pm

» Prayers for my Wife Please
by balogh Today at 4:08 pm

» Jim Walkers FireBee - This is going to be fun
by rdw777 Today at 3:58 pm

» Hawk had breakfast and then took a bath
by rdw777 Today at 3:46 pm

» Roddie's water-cooling bottle for bench-running
by roddie Today at 3:07 pm

» Removing old decals
by latole Today at 3:06 pm

» Prop Rod - resto to a runner
by rsv1cox Today at 2:29 pm

» Cox Ryan ST 2.0
by 944_Jim Today at 11:52 am

» Blue backplate postage stamp engine
by getback Today at 6:46 am

» COX Postage Stamp engine -Babe Bee & Horseshoe Backplate adapters
by GallopingGhostler Today at 6:33 am

Cox Engine of The Month
May-2024
1/2A Nut's

"Cox Tee Dee .051 RC Marine"



PAST WINNERS
CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
Gallery


CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty
Live on Patrol


CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Page 18 of 20 Previous  1 ... 10 ... 17, 18, 19, 20  Next

Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  JPvelo Mon Dec 14, 2015 6:38 am

I'm going to extend the deadlines one month to see if we can get some more participants. Photos due 1/14/16, video due 1/31/16.

Jim
JPvelo
JPvelo
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Posts : 1972
Join date : 2011-12-02
Age : 56
Location : Colorado

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Fri Jan 01, 2016 6:32 pm

I've got a plan..

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1610

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Lockhe10

This is the start of my New Year's attempt to build a stand way-off profile scale T33 for my newly acquired Tee Dee's .049/.051 graciously gifted to me almost a year ago for my birthday by a fellow CEF member. He wanted(s) me to build a build a speed model for this upcoming contest.. and I'm afraid I'm off to a very late start. I'm off work until Tuesday though.. and today was "redesign the fuse and draw a plan" day.

I need to make engine-beams. I have a 1/4" maple piece that I have to rip-down square. I'll need to fix a thin sheet to my table-saw for it's blade to pass-through, so I can utilize a push-stick.. without worry of the stock falling through the metal plate surrounding the blade.

I used double-stick tape to secure a piece of wood to the saw's table..

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1611

Placed tight against the ripping-fence.. I proceeded to cut up through it, to a height sufficient to cut the maple stock.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1612

Success! Even my camera is cooperating! My caliper measures .255" square!

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1613

This design shows signs of being wicked nose-heavy.. Shocked  and I'm probably out of my mind to even attempt it.. but I'm going to give it a shot. I'm going with a full-span elevator.. and no landing gear. The fuse will have guide-tabs on it's belly, for launching from a take-off dolly.

Since I had a good setting on the saw.. I figured; rip another length (15") of maple for future engine beams.. and some 1/4" sq. balsa sticks; some of which will serve as stock to "cap" the long maple beams.. top/bottom on the T33.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1614

The fuse's tail-section is 1/4" balsa sheet, which fits between and fairs into the ends of the maple beams which are 7.5" long. Next comes drilling the Tee Dee's mount-holes and mounting the engine to establish the gap-size for the 1/4"
balsa core to key-into/between the beams and straight out to the tail. I'm hoping that this construction will provide a nice rigid nose for the Tee Dee.. as well as to spread some of the weight rearward. The wing-slot will be incorporated into the balsa-core. The 1/8" balsa sheet-wing will be glued on top of the lower beam and into the balsa core-slot.





Last edited by roddie on Fri Jan 01, 2016 8:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  Marleysky Fri Jan 01, 2016 8:04 pm

Roddie, I really like your Plan, your Plane and your Pattern...for the "blade guard, hole cover"  My table saw has a similar over size hole for the blade, and I will use your pattern next time I have to rip down some stick stock.  Thanks!
Marleysky
Marleysky
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

Posts : 3618
Join date : 2014-09-28
Age : 71
Location : Grand Rapids, MI

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Fri Jan 01, 2016 8:31 pm

Marleysky wrote:Roddie, I really like your Plan, your Plane and your Pattern...for the "blade guard, hole cover"  My table saw has a similar over size hole for the blade, and I will use your pattern next time I have to rip down some stick stock.  Thanks!

This was a first try for me with this technique.. but it worked quite well. The push-stick is a MUST. I used a 7-1/4" dia. carbide-tipped saw-blade set approx. 1/4" higher than my stock to be cut. I measured off the ripping-fence with a machinist-rule, to the edge of the carbide-blade tip to set the cut-width. I was concerned with heat/burning.. but had no issues at all with that.
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Fri Jan 01, 2016 9:53 pm

A bit more progress on the beams.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1615

This old hardware package has been waiting decades for this opportunity.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1616
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1617
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1618
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1619
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1620

The beams extend forward for their balsa "trim-caps" to establish the curvature of the nose. I'd like to think of it as setting the engine back as far as I can in the fuse. Tee Dee's are a different animal for me. Does anybody see any potential problems with this mounting method? The cylinder is planned to be oriented outboard.
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  cox24711 Fri Jan 01, 2016 9:59 pm

did you use nylock nuts?
cox24711
cox24711
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Posts : 722
Join date : 2014-01-18
Age : 21
Location : Noosa Queensland Australia

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:19 pm

cox24711 wrote:did you use nylock nuts?

Hi Greg! There's lock-nuts included with the hardware package.. and I figured I'd use them unless cautioned against it. I thought about using wood-screws.. but the 1/4" (6.35mm) square beams don't have a "comfortable" amount of meat to hold them.. not to mention the short length they'd need to be. There's also the risk of splitting the beam if the pilot-holes are drilled too small. I drilled .070" (1.78mm) pilot-holes first.. then enlarged them to .098" (2.5mm) which is the hole size in the engine-lug. A 3-48 machine-screw has a .095" diameter. The spacing between holes is .375" (9.53mm) on center for the Cox Tee Dee .049 engine. I used an awl to mark the holes beforehand.. to help start the drill in the center of the beam.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1621
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  Ken Cook Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:44 am

I assume your going with a tank? If what I'm seeing is correct then yes I see a  problem. The TD is very sensitive to the tank. If the tank is going to be mounted on the outboard side of your engine crutch, the centerline of engine is now further inboard. In the event you do mount a tank place it on the same side of the beams  as your engine lugs. In other words if that cylinder is to be mounted for outboard position, the tank will be on the inboard side which means the tank has to be replumbed if your decide to use a stock tank. This now leads to other problems because the faster the plane flies the richer the fuel mix goes. Where most tanks typically get shimmed up and down, this now would require to be shimmed left to right which isn't practical unless you leave that area open for access or shim your engine off  the beams.  Just for the record, Cox engines were meant to be mounted with 3-48 screws which are increasingly getting rarer. Ken


Just for clarification, is the TD allowed to be used in these speed contests? I wasn't aware of that if it was as I have current designs using the TD.
Ken Cook
Ken Cook
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 5485
Join date : 2012-03-27
Location : pennsylvania

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  fredvon4 Sat Jan 02, 2016 7:50 am

I would be tempted to use the outboard wing tank of the T-33 for a long thin bladder as the fuel and tip weight for the brief flights
fredvon4
fredvon4
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

Posts : 4002
Join date : 2011-08-26
Age : 68
Location : Lampasas Texas

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  getback Sat Jan 02, 2016 12:06 pm

Roddie I have never seen anyone mount the engine as you have it why did you chose this way ? CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Why10 as Ken said about the centering of the engine with the crankcase on the inboard side . getback Huh...
getback
getback
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 10159
Join date : 2013-01-18
Age : 66
Location : julian , NC

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Sat Jan 02, 2016 12:21 pm

Ken Cook wrote:I assume your going with a tank? If what I'm seeing is correct then yes I see a problem. The TD is very sensitive to the tank. If the tank is going to be mounted on the outboard side of your engine crutch, the centerline of engine is now further inboard. In the event you do mount a tank place it on the same side of the beams as your engine lugs. In other words if that cylinder is to be mounted for outboard position, the tank will be on the inboard side which means the tank has to be replumbed if your decide to use a stock tank. This now leads to other problems because the faster the plane flies the richer the fuel mix goes. Where most tanks typically get shimmed up and down, this now would require to be shimmed left to right which isn't practical unless you leave that area open for access or shim your engine off the beams. Just for the record, Cox engines were meant to be mounted with 3-48 screws which are increasingly getting rarer. Ken


Just for clarification, is the TD allowed to be used in these speed contests? I wasn't aware of that if it was as I have current designs using the TD.

Hi Ken, Yes.. there is a Tee Dee .049/.051 class now.. and the line-length has been reduced from 42 to 35 feet. I was planning to run a balloon tank in a streamlined capsule . Would it's position still be critical? The engine position was somewhat dictated by my desire to extend the beams forward to just behind the prop-driver. The pressure nipple sticks down below the lug slightly. I could notch the beam to clear the nipple I suppose. Thanks as always for the advice.
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  cox24711 Sat Jan 02, 2016 3:34 pm

roddie wrote:
cox24711 wrote:did you use nylock nuts?

Hi Greg! There's lock-nuts included with the hardware package.. and I figured I'd use them unless cautioned against it. I thought about using wood-screws.. but the 1/4" (6.35mm) square beams don't have a "comfortable" amount of meat to hold them.. not to mention the short length they'd need to be. There's also the risk of splitting the beam if the pilot-holes are drilled too small. I drilled .070" (1.78mm) pilot-holes first.. then enlarged them to .098" (2.5mm) which is the hole size in the engine-lug. A 3-48 machine-screw has a .095" diameter. The spacing between holes is .375" (9.53mm) on center for the Cox Tee Dee .049 engine. I used an awl to mark the holes beforehand.. to help start the drill in the center of the beam.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-1-1621

COOLIES p.s thanks for the conversions!
cox24711
cox24711
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Posts : 722
Join date : 2014-01-18
Age : 21
Location : Noosa Queensland Australia

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  cox24711 Sat Jan 02, 2016 3:38 pm

getback wrote:Ok here you go some cuts / more sanding and sanding primer cut with clear dope  CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 P51_d_10   CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 P51_d_11   CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 P51_d_12   CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 P51_d_13   Yes I am going to fly a Knife Edge the whole flight LOL Thanks Kim for the Kicking I needed. Bearers tomorrow sanding and epoxy. Need to figure out the tail feathers placement /  getback This Site Rocks!

let me guess mustang p51 or p40 there is a radiator under the wing so that mean it could not have a prat and whitney wasp (they are air cooled) meaning there was no choice unless it is not american!
cox24711
cox24711
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Posts : 722
Join date : 2014-01-18
Age : 21
Location : Noosa Queensland Australia

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:42 pm

I've come to my senses.. and filed that notch in the beam to clear the pressure-nipple on the Tee Dee.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1610

The wing-position is a LoOoOong ways back on this jet.. Shocked

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 T3310

I cut a piece of 1/4" balsa to fit between the beams and all the way out to the tail. It has the 4" root-chord wing cut-out slot. Now I will piece-in 1/4" balsa; top and bottom to create the fuse's profile.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1612
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  pkrankow Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:55 pm

Nothing wrong with the under the beams mount of the motor. It looks odd, but it has been done by others before. The engine won't care.

Wood screws are a bad idea on beam mount engines. Use bolts (machine screws) and lock nuts, or double nut, or use CA or lock-tite in the threads. The side loading will cause wood screws to pull out over time. With firewall mounting the loading does not open the hole up in the same way.

Phil

pkrankow
pkrankow
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 3025
Join date : 2012-10-02
Location : Ohio

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  getback Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:06 pm

Looking good Roddie here is were I am , thought about what U said man I am too far along to redo it now (pm) Greg its suppose to bee a P-51 D  CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Truck_10  CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Truck_11         when it breaks I will fix it Beers  getback Happy New Year
getback
getback
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 10159
Join date : 2013-01-18
Age : 66
Location : julian , NC

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Sat Jan 02, 2016 6:41 pm

That's right Eric! I like the paint colors! Is that Aero-Gloss "Silvaire Aluminum"? Dayeeem.. looks like you sprayed it. Nice sanding job on the fuse contour!

I'm making more progress than I thought I would today.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1613
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1614
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1615
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1616
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  akjgardner Sat Jan 02, 2016 7:44 pm

looking good Roddie
akjgardner
akjgardner
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

2023 Supporter

2024 Supporter

Posts : 1477
Join date : 2014-12-28
Age : 64
Location : Greensberg Indiana

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  akjgardner Sat Jan 02, 2016 7:45 pm

getback wrote:Looking good Roddie here is were I am , thought about what U said man I am too far along to redo it now (pm) Greg its suppose to bee a P-51 D  CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Truck_10  CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Truck_11         when it breaks I will fix it Beers  getback Happy New Year
looking good Eric
akjgardner
akjgardner
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

2023 Supporter

2024 Supporter

Posts : 1477
Join date : 2014-12-28
Age : 64
Location : Greensberg Indiana

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:05 pm

akjgardner wrote:looking good Roddie

Thanks Joe! This is the engine that was given to me to compete with.. I'm a little nervous though. I wouldn't want to have a mishap with this one.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1620
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1621
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  getback Sun Jan 03, 2016 7:05 am

Thanks guys ,not much more to do just need to get to it !! going to try and work on it today , I need to test another engine against the one I ran the other day and decide on a tank! The paint for fuse was Krylon (satin nickel/brushed metallic ) and Rust -Opium for the blue. Very Happy Roddie your moving right along , what engine is that .051 ? Those beams running back that far should give you plenty of strength and I like the way they look too . I want to get out today and do some flying it will bee 56 * high and then the weather will fall off the grid for some cold days /nites and then roller coaster back to 61 * next weekend , that's when I want to use that window to fly this baby and it really needs to go the first time or with maybe a quick fix if necessary Shocked getback Cold
getback
getback
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 10159
Join date : 2013-01-18
Age : 66
Location : julian , NC

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:51 am

getback wrote: The paint for fuse was Krylon (satin nickel/brushed metallic ) and Rust -Opium for the blue. Very Happy    Roddie your moving right along , what engine is that .051 ? Those beams running back that far should give you plenty of strength and I like the way they look too .

Rust-Opium.. I've never tried that.. Laughing The Satin-Nickel is sweet! So you paint-brushed it Huh... looks really nice man! Are you gonna clear-it.. or does it test as fuel resistant? I saved photos from a Krylon orange-color test that you did a while back.

I bought a can of Minwax aerosol clear-gloss lacquer a few months ago (on clearance)

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Minwax10
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Minwax11

I need to test for both; undercoat compatibility.. and fuel resistance.

Yes, that's a Tee Dee .051 in the recent T33 model photos. I mounted it to keep the psych going! I can't afford to have this build take the amount of time that the Rare-Bear did.. Laughing

roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  getback Sun Jan 03, 2016 11:14 am

That stuff was spray and very thin (runny) had to wipe it the first time then two coats , if I put some decals on it witch I have trouble figuring out the right ones I will clear coat it . I have 3 difft. clears to pick from all should be good either way though . the paint CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 00110  the clear  CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Wp_20117  I got to gooooo right now this is fun but ,,, not getting it done Later ! getback Very Happy
getback
getback
Top Poster
Top Poster

2022 Supporter

2023 Supporter

Posts : 10159
Join date : 2013-01-18
Age : 66
Location : julian , NC

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  pkrankow Sun Jan 03, 2016 12:07 pm

roddie wrote:
getback wrote: The paint for fuse was Krylon (satin nickel/brushed metallic ) and Rust -Opium for the blue. Very Happy    Roddie your moving right along , what engine is that .051 ? Those beams running back that far should give you plenty of strength and I like the way they look too .

Rust-Opium.. I've never tried that.. Laughing The Satin-Nickel is sweet! So you paint-brushed it Huh...  looks really nice man! Are you gonna clear-it.. or does it test as fuel resistant? I saved photos from a Krylon orange-color test that you did a while back.

I bought a can of Minwax aerosol clear-gloss lacquer a few months ago (on clearance)

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Minwax10
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Minwax11

I need to test for both; undercoat compatibility.. and fuel resistance.

Yes, that's a Tee Dee .051 in the recent T33 model photos. I mounted it to keep the psych going! I can't afford to have this build take the amount of time that the Rare-Bear did.. Laughing


This is lacquer, not polyurethane. It is not fuel proof. This is pretty similar to fingernail polish. It _should_ be compatible with dope. It would work in the same manner as using nitrate under butylrate, even though the nitrate is not fuel proof. Test anyways.

After a suitable cure time, several days at least, it should be compatible with enamel. HOWEVER be careful as dope/enamel/dope is not a good layer combination. The enamel will allow the lower layer of dope (or lacquer) to soften causing the enamel to slough (fall off).

Phil
pkrankow
pkrankow
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 3025
Join date : 2012-10-02
Location : Ohio

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  roddie Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:16 pm

Thanks Phil.. finishing is not my forte. I can use all the help I can get!  Laughing

I set my model into the take-off dolly.. to see what I need to do.

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1623
CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-2-1624

I have a couple options.. slot the belly of the fuse, when I figure out the balance-point.. or install a vertical pin that sticks down from the same place. A pin will help protect the needle somewhat when landing.. but I see now that I really need to take more action for that condition.

A variation of this might work.. (as if I don't have enough weight forward..  Rolling Eyes )

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 1-3-1610
roddie
roddie
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 8319
Join date : 2013-07-17
Age : 64
Location : N. Smithfield, Rhode Island

http://www.stilburnin.com

Back to top Go down

CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014) - Page 18 Empty Re: CEF speed contest Design Discussions (2014)

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 18 of 20 Previous  1 ... 10 ... 17, 18, 19, 20  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum