Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register! Guests are limited to posting in the "General Questions (Guest Posting Allowed)" section only. Becoming a member is fast, easy and FREE!


COX prop limitation on use Babe_b10
Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Merlin inserts?
by Marleysky Today at 11:31 am

» It's all about balance.
by Iceberg Today at 10:54 am

» Plastic tank issues
by fredvon4 Today at 9:59 am

» Here. Hold my beer.
by rsv1cox Today at 9:54 am

» Two New 1/2a Combat Planes
by NEW222 Today at 9:16 am

» OS engine ?
by Ken Cook Today at 4:06 am

» Kirn NVA Issues
by Aero Yesterday at 8:36 pm

» Part ID: Back Plate Extension?
by roddie Yesterday at 8:05 pm

» Tony (xplaneguy) Visits with the Breezy Hill Flyers
by Kim Yesterday at 2:08 pm

» cox gtp 049 mod
by davidll1984 Yesterday at 10:41 am

Cox Engine of The Month
October-2020
Jason_WI's

"Pieces and parts RR-1. New crank, rotary valve, and drive plate. Early #1 cylinder. Drilled out golden bee backplate. Battle hardened crankcase and tank."



PAST WINNERS
CEF Traveling Engine

Win This Engine!
Forum Store
Gallery


COX prop limitation on use Empty

COX prop limitation on use

Go down

COX prop limitation on use Empty COX prop limitation on use

Post  balogh on Tue Oct 06, 2020 1:36 pm

Below is the magnified picture of a COX 4.5x4 prop hub that says: Do not use on RR-1, Thermal Hopper and Space Bug.

COX prop limitation on use Screen31


While the latter 2 are distinctly different antique engines with unique crankshafts , the RR-1 is just a modified reedie..

Does anyone know why the use of this prop is restricted like that?

COX International, selling this prop, offers it for use on any COX 049 engine... Huh...
balogh
balogh
Top Poster
Top Poster

2019 Supporter

Posts : 3142
Join date : 2011-11-06
Age : 61
Location : Budapest Hungary

Back to top Go down

COX prop limitation on use Empty Re: COX prop limitation on use

Post  Mudhen on Tue Oct 06, 2020 3:19 pm

My guess is it’s a throwback to pre-nylon days.
Until 1956, except for Tornados, Cox used Kaysun polystyrene propellers. Very brittle, subject to creeping, and dangerous. When Cox began manufacturing its own props, it still used a semi-rigid composite before moving to nylon. Its brittleness also was dangerous for high performance engines, thus the warning. After switching to nylon, it seems there’s no value amending the molds when few peeps would notice the warning.
Mudhen
Mudhen
Gold Member
Gold Member

Posts : 456
Join date : 2011-09-19

Back to top Go down

COX prop limitation on use Empty Re: COX prop limitation on use

Post  sosam117 on Tue Oct 06, 2020 3:32 pm

Mudhen wrote:My guess is it’s a throwback to pre-nylon days.
Until 1956, except for Tornados, Cox used Kaysun polystyrene propellers. Very brittle, subject to creeping, and dangerous. When Cox began manufacturing its own props, it still used a semi-rigid composite before moving to nylon. Its brittleness also was dangerous for high performance engines, thus the warning. After switching to nylon, it seems there’s no value amending the molds when few peeps would notice the warning.

You would be surprised to see a nylon/plastic prop as it is spinning it is also flexing and twisting.
Like the turbine blades on a wind generator, whose blades flex up to over 12 feet when turning.
Wind pushing on the blades push them back to move them.
If you had access to a high speed camera you would see our nylon/plastic props flexing while running.
A friend of mine worked for a helicopter manufacturer and showed my a video of the helicopter's blades (in flight) and how they were flexing and twisting. After so many hours the blades are retired and new ones installed. It was an eye opener!
sosam117
sosam117
Gold Member
Gold Member

Posts : 149
Join date : 2016-03-23
Location : Chicago, Illinois

Back to top Go down

COX prop limitation on use Empty Re: COX prop limitation on use

Post  balogh on Tue Oct 06, 2020 4:21 pm

Thanks Mudhen it is funny that the warnings became obsolete but still survived in the mold! I also assumed it was performance related but wondered why use on  TeeDees was not restricted...now I know: because when the warning was cast on the prop hub, TeeDes did not exist yet i.e. before 61 or so.
balogh
balogh
Top Poster
Top Poster

2019 Supporter

Posts : 3142
Join date : 2011-11-06
Age : 61
Location : Budapest Hungary

Back to top Go down

COX prop limitation on use Empty Re: COX prop limitation on use

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum