Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Happy Anzac Day!by Boats13 Today at 11:03 pm
» Three -- sold out (making two more) Cox .010 Carburetors with wrench
by sosam117 Today at 10:41 pm
» Fox .35 Modifications
by Ken Cook Today at 10:20 pm
» Project Cox .049 r/c & Citabrian Champion
by MauricioB Today at 4:08 pm
» Jim Walkers FireBee - This is going to be fun
by rsv1cox Today at 3:56 pm
» Revivng Some Childhood Classics
by rsv1cox Today at 7:17 am
» Introducing our Cox .049 TD Engines
by getback Today at 6:20 am
» Roddie's flat-bottomed boat..
by Levent Suberk Today at 12:23 am
» Cox powered jet-pump for model Sprint Boat
by roddie Yesterday at 10:25 pm
» Micro Draco Gets to Fly on a Beautiful Morning.
by rdw777 Yesterday at 8:15 pm
» Jim Walker Firebaby
by rdw777 Yesterday at 8:06 pm
» Hydro-bat by Vic Smeed: engine probs
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 5:12 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
Cox .020 Pee Wee/Tee Dee question.
Page 1 of 1
Cox .020 Pee Wee/Tee Dee question.
Were there any differences in "cylinder-porting" between these two engines? The Tee Dee .049 for example; has additional "boost-flutes" in its cylinder-porting.
Is there such a thing as a "Tee Dee .020 cylinder".. or were all Cox .020 cylinders designed with the same porting? Did Cox ever apply sub-port induction to an .020 cylinder? It would seem that a Tee Dee .020 would offer more than rotary-valve induction, to classify it as a "Tee Dee" series-engine. The Cox "Medallion" series engines didn't offer much more over a reed-valve engine of same displacement, other than having rotary-valve induction. Maybe it was a Cox "marketing-decision".. not to classify the Tee Dee .020 as a "Medallion" .020?
any info/thoughts appreciated..
Is there such a thing as a "Tee Dee .020 cylinder".. or were all Cox .020 cylinders designed with the same porting? Did Cox ever apply sub-port induction to an .020 cylinder? It would seem that a Tee Dee .020 would offer more than rotary-valve induction, to classify it as a "Tee Dee" series-engine. The Cox "Medallion" series engines didn't offer much more over a reed-valve engine of same displacement, other than having rotary-valve induction. Maybe it was a Cox "marketing-decision".. not to classify the Tee Dee .020 as a "Medallion" .020?
any info/thoughts appreciated..
Re: Cox .020 Pee Wee/Tee Dee question.
Cylinders are all the same for the .020. The only difference is thin walled, stepped wall, thick walled, mesh, and slotted screen. Nothing affected the ports on these variants.
Early .020 TD pistons were tapered. This was phased out in '72.
Early .020 TD pistons were tapered. This was phased out in '72.
Jason_WI- Top Poster
-
Posts : 3123
Join date : 2011-10-09
Age : 48
Location : Neenah, WI
Re: Cox .020 Pee Wee/Tee Dee question.
Jason_WI wrote:Cylinders are all the same for the .020. The only difference is thin walled, stepped wall, thick walled, mesh, and slotted screen. Nothing affected the ports on these variants.
Early .020 TD pistons were tapered. This was phased out in '72.
Thank You Jason!
Re: Cox .020 Pee Wee/Tee Dee question.
roddie wrote:Did Cox ever apply sub-port induction to an .020 cylinder?
They all have SPI, as far as I know.
The amount of SPI can vary quite a lot though, from one engine to another, but that mainly comes from the length on the conrod. It seems that the manufacturing of the conrod ball-joint to the piston might be the problem, difficult to manufacture accurately I guess. I wrote a thread on that topic some time ago on this forum.
Surfer_kris- Diamond Member
- Posts : 1905
Join date : 2010-11-20
Location : Sweden
Similar topics
» Cox TD 020 question
» .O49 Cox? Question
» cox pee wee and .010 question
» 2C OS not 2B OS. An OS 25 FSR Question.
» Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
» .O49 Cox? Question
» cox pee wee and .010 question
» 2C OS not 2B OS. An OS 25 FSR Question.
» Please, need some help to identify a Baby Bee ?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum