Cox Engines Forum
You are not logged in! Please login or register.

Logged in members see NO ADVERTISEMENTS!


Jim's 4 stroke twin Cox_ba12





Log in

I forgot my password

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Scientifc Stunt Trainer
by rsv1cox Today at 6:28 pm

» .020 Pee Wee won't start
by Ken Cook Today at 5:16 pm

» Loose ends................
by GallopingGhostler Today at 1:59 pm

» Cox PeeWee Micro Speeder
by Tobaiies Today at 11:41 am

» Question for Ken Cook -- CG location
by Kim Today at 5:05 am

» Follow The World's Smallest Traveling Engine!
by Oldenginerod Today at 12:00 am

» wanted - near impossible - .010 crank and cylinder
by cstatman Thu Jun 23, 2022 5:26 pm

» 1/2A Streaker
by Dick Russ Thu Jun 23, 2022 2:46 pm

» Cox Pee Wee for sale in a Turkish website
by GallopingGhostler Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:45 am

» New In Box Cox Cobra Three Radio
by GallopingGhostler Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:51 am

» Top Flight School boy
by GallopingGhostler Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:07 am

» Building a gas powered windmill and now a boat
by getback Thu Jun 23, 2022 6:16 am

Cox Engine of The Month
June-2022
balogh's

"COX Tee Dee .051 on duty"



PAST WINNERS
CEF Traveling Engine

Dick Russ Models
Win This Engine!
Forum Store
CEF Ear Savers
Gallery


Jim's 4 stroke twin Empty

Jim's 4 stroke twin

Go down

Jim's 4 stroke twin Empty Jim's 4 stroke twin

Post  706jim Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:53 pm

Jim's 4 stroke twin Z38_im13

Something different for this group, my original design 4 stroke twin. Powered by two Surpass 40's with one reverse rotation. 8 Futaba S133's and two Futaba receivers. Will happily fly one either engine once airborne. I designed this with two long fuselages and twin rudders to give it directional stability and the result was successful. My project from 20+ years ago.
706jim
706jim
Gold Member
Gold Member

Posts : 331
Join date : 2013-11-29

Back to top Go down

Jim's 4 stroke twin Empty Re: Jim's 4 stroke twin

Post  rsv1cox Wed Mar 20, 2019 8:35 am

Jim, that's the darnedest thing I have ever seen.

Surpass 40's with one reverse rotation???????????

Same frequencies on both systems, sounds confusing.

Guess you could set the trim on one engine to cut out mid flight if you wanted. Interesting flight possibilities.

Bob
rsv1cox
rsv1cox
Top Poster
Top Poster

2020 Supporter

2021 Supporter

2022 Supporter

Posts : 7938
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : West Virginia

Back to top Go down

Jim's 4 stroke twin Empty Re: Jim's 4 stroke twin

Post  getback Wed Mar 20, 2019 9:16 am

That's Cool !! man you made the Mag. way back then , Good looking airplane ! That Baby has some weight to is at 8-11 lbs. I didn't know you ran one engine in rev. on RC twin planes thats interesting  RC Plane Got any video of her flying ? Shamrock
getback
getback
Top Poster
Top Poster

2020 Supporter

2022 Supporter

Posts : 8819
Join date : 2013-01-18
Age : 64
Location : julian , NC

Back to top Go down

Jim's 4 stroke twin Empty Re: Jim's 4 stroke twin

Post  706jim Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:56 pm

No video of her flying, maybe sometime later. Video cameras on phones didn't exist when I flew in in the 90's. The airplane as shown here was involved in a mid air at a float fly with a Notforsale. Chopped the wing in half, so I rebuilt it with a new wing (it's basically from a Goldberg Cub) and at that time installed a reverse cam in one of the engines. This required setting up a Sullivan starter to allow it to run in reverse or forward to get both engines running. Using two receivers solved a lot of wiring problems and unlike modern radios, both operated nicely from the same transmitter. I built it because I wanted to actually be able to fly a twin. Most DC3's Marauders etc are heavy detailed scale models that rarely make it to the field. This one was purpose built to fly easily.

Modelers flying twins worry too much about engine synchronization. Even if you get them running at the same WOT rpm, guess what? They will never be the same at part throttle or idle. It it matters not a bit! One of the magic things about a twin is the sound of the engines coming in and out of synchronization. Two engines gave this model a really short takeoff run, maybe 20'-30' on floats. And roll rate is slow kind of like a bomber. And with those long fuselages and double rudders, the plane will fly on either engine.

Of note is turning performance. Whether you realize it or not, we tend to favour right turns due to gyroscopic forces that tend to lift the nose during a turn. Turning the other way, the nose is pushed down, so a left turn is less 'comfortable" if you turn mostly with ailerons. Having the engines run in opposite rotation completely eliminated this effect.

All in all it was a fun project and getting on a magazine cover was a bonus.

(BTW, Maac sent me 10 copies just like in that song "Cover of the Rolling Stone" by Dr Hook)
706jim
706jim
Gold Member
Gold Member

Posts : 331
Join date : 2013-11-29

Back to top Go down

Jim's 4 stroke twin Empty Re: Jim's 4 stroke twin

Post  NEW222 Wed Mar 20, 2019 6:35 pm

That is very neat. I like it.
NEW222
NEW222
Top Poster
Top Poster

Posts : 3681
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 43
Location : oakbank, mb

Back to top Go down

Jim's 4 stroke twin Empty Re: Jim's 4 stroke twin

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum