Log in
Search
Latest topics
» Fox .35 Modifications by Onelife Today at 6:47 pm
» Happy Anzac Day!
by 706jim Today at 6:44 pm
» Project Cox .049 r/c & Citabrian Champion
by MauricioB Today at 4:08 pm
» Jim Walkers FireBee - This is going to be fun
by rsv1cox Today at 3:56 pm
» Revivng Some Childhood Classics
by rsv1cox Today at 7:17 am
» Introducing our Cox .049 TD Engines
by getback Today at 6:20 am
» Roddie's flat-bottomed boat..
by Levent Suberk Today at 12:23 am
» Cox powered jet-pump for model Sprint Boat
by roddie Yesterday at 10:25 pm
» Micro Draco Gets to Fly on a Beautiful Morning.
by rdw777 Yesterday at 8:15 pm
» Jim Walker Firebaby
by rdw777 Yesterday at 8:06 pm
» Hydro-bat by Vic Smeed: engine probs
by GallopingGhostler Yesterday at 5:12 pm
» Roddie-Rigger.. a 2005 original design
by roddie Yesterday at 3:39 pm
Cox Engine of The Month
A direct question for 1/2a nut
Page 1 of 1
A direct question for 1/2a nut
A direct question two 1/2a nut. Can you explain to me how you can run a tuned pipe with spi Geoff
geoffwise- Beginner Poster
- Posts : 6
Join date : 2015-12-16
Re: A direct question for 1/2a nut
Hi Geoff some of the following you most likely know I will try and keep this brief.
Many engines that have SPI still run fine I have personally used
the following 1/2A engines (see list below) also other larger engines with SPI.
If you have a Cox .05 RC cylinder piston use that with a Profi 1/2A pipe
or a CS .049 - .061 pipe. I would prefer no SPI with pipes. The SPI
window is very very short time wise per cycle, fuel air intake is good
with no pressure tap needed to function. I prefer a pressure tap all
the same for insurance. Does not need to be high pressure just positive.
The SPI seems to get a boost all the same from the pipe. These simple
2 stroke engines waste fuel there is usable fuel vapor in the header
able to get drawn back in when the SPI gate is open. As the piston
rises up from BDC the pipe charges the combustion chamber with
the it's best possible charge based on exhaust timing duration. Longer
the duration bigger the charge. SPI makes up for some losses by charging
the case it all makes it to the combustion chamber that is why a power
boost is present even with a 140 deg engine. Consider it a 2 phase boost
rather than a single phase boost with non SPI engines. A single exhaust
port engine is best for best pipe induction less lag time. Therefore a
dual port Cox engine requires one of the exhaust ports to be blocked off
and the header directly located at the open port. Zero lag max influx is
the only positive solution for optimum influx and breathing.
Small engine use to date:
- Cox .049 and .051 and best non SPI .05 (28.1k)
- Sportwerks .05 (37.7k rpm)
- Norvel .061 (29k rpm)
- Fuji .05 ( 38k rpm)
- Picco P0 .05 ( 50.3k rpm)
- SH .07 (38.7k rpm)
- GZ .049 (36k rpm)
Many Youtube vids with me using 1/2A Profi pipes I have 6 of them and 1 CS/GZ pipe.
Many engines that have SPI still run fine I have personally used
the following 1/2A engines (see list below) also other larger engines with SPI.
If you have a Cox .05 RC cylinder piston use that with a Profi 1/2A pipe
or a CS .049 - .061 pipe. I would prefer no SPI with pipes. The SPI
window is very very short time wise per cycle, fuel air intake is good
with no pressure tap needed to function. I prefer a pressure tap all
the same for insurance. Does not need to be high pressure just positive.
The SPI seems to get a boost all the same from the pipe. These simple
2 stroke engines waste fuel there is usable fuel vapor in the header
able to get drawn back in when the SPI gate is open. As the piston
rises up from BDC the pipe charges the combustion chamber with
the it's best possible charge based on exhaust timing duration. Longer
the duration bigger the charge. SPI makes up for some losses by charging
the case it all makes it to the combustion chamber that is why a power
boost is present even with a 140 deg engine. Consider it a 2 phase boost
rather than a single phase boost with non SPI engines. A single exhaust
port engine is best for best pipe induction less lag time. Therefore a
dual port Cox engine requires one of the exhaust ports to be blocked off
and the header directly located at the open port. Zero lag max influx is
the only positive solution for optimum influx and breathing.
Small engine use to date:
- Cox .049 and .051 and best non SPI .05 (28.1k)
- Sportwerks .05 (37.7k rpm)
- Norvel .061 (29k rpm)
- Fuji .05 ( 38k rpm)
- Picco P0 .05 ( 50.3k rpm)
- SH .07 (38.7k rpm)
- GZ .049 (36k rpm)
Many Youtube vids with me using 1/2A Profi pipes I have 6 of them and 1 CS/GZ pipe.
1/2A Nut- Top Poster
- Posts : 3426
Join date : 2013-10-20
Age : 60
Location : Brad in Texas
Re: A direct question for 1/2a nut
Hi amp A good read I have not intended tuning a cox done all that a long time ago i just want to start off at the right place for rc carb set up I do not need high RPM !!! For 1/2a mustang.a muffler feed stops vent flapping about. lol .
geoffwise- Beginner Poster
- Posts : 6
Join date : 2015-12-16
Similar topics
» Cox .020 Pee Wee/Tee Dee question.
» To Bee or Not to Bee/ that is the Question?
» NIB Enya .049-II TV conversion
» Another Question?.
» CG question
» To Bee or Not to Bee/ that is the Question?
» NIB Enya .049-II TV conversion
» Another Question?.
» CG question
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum